Tuesday, April 15, 2008

RACIZM: A HARMFUL VIRUS (Editorial)

There is a saying, “If one part of a human body is suffering from any disease then he is not physically fit and he needs a thorough check up. That disease is caused due to some harmful virus.” During the British Raj it can be said that India too was suffering from that disease. Indians were treated worse than labours within their own country, they didn’t have any fundamental rights and there was anarchy everywhere. They were racially abused for their brown skin and were tortured when they asked for a small share within their own homeland. Many Indians gave up their lives for the freedom of the country. Similarly Africans too were treated sub-humanely and were racially abused and had faced many derogatory remarks. But they never gave up and they faught for their independence and fundamental rights. One such example was the discrimination in the film industry between the blackskinned and the white skinned people. A Long time ago blacks were looked down upon because of the colour of their skin. To enter the film industry they started acting in theatres which were not acceptable by whites. Gradually these blacks were successful making inroads into the predominantly white dominated African film industry. Although, initially the lead roles were always performed by white Africans and the role of a servant or other secondary class were given to blacks. Later, through generations of constant struggle they managed to gain success in getting lead roles in film industry. But that was long time ago.

There has been remarkable development from the 18th century to 21st century. In this phase of global revolution, the countries are building good relations with each other. Over the years, India has developed good relation with the countries like China, Japan, America and Russia. Howe ever, India is progressing politically and economically but still it has not been able get rid of its old disease. Racial discrimination and corrupt politicians manipulating the public is halting whatever progress we have made as a country. Before independence the virus ‘racial discrimination’ was spread by the British but now the disease is spread by our own Indian politicians. India is divided between weaker and powerful sections of society. Powerful people like industrialist, politicians, and lawyers are crushing the weaker sections of society which includes farmers, rickshawpullars, and peasants for their selfish needs. No doubt the government of Nandigram is responsible for its crisis. The strategy applied to capture government land from peasants was extremely shameful. Politicians were enjoying the power and luxuries without caring about those peasants who were killed by the powerful butchers. Hundreds of people became homeless and many were orphaned. The government of Nandigram did not provide any compensation to those peasants who suffered the violence. It is sad that Indian politicians are so selfish that they only concentrate in building big companies and solving the problems of rich and powerful, whereas the problems of poor and illiterate people are silently kept aside. There is no difference between politicians and Britishers. To be rich and powerful always discriminated Indians on the grounds of their religion, culture and state.

The discrimination started just after the Godhra riots when our politicians divided us on the basis of our religion. Politicians themselves are responsible for the birth of terrorism and now, politicians are trying to divide us on the basis of the state we are born in. Raj Thakrey hurt the religious sentiments of North Indians by making derogatory remarks on “Chhat Puja.” He also made derogatory remarks on Biharis. He claims that Maharashtra belongs to the marathis and that the North Indians should leave ‘his’ state and work within their own respective states thereby going against our very basic fundamental right. Being a citizen of India we are free to stay and work in any state of India. This remark has created enough violence in all the states of India, essentially disrupting the livelihood of the very poor that is the taxi drivers and shopkeepers who were attacked and injured. How can an Indian tell another Indian which state to live and work in?

Politicians like Raj Thakeray are an embarrassment for our country although Raj Thakeray has only followed his own Uncle Bal Thakereys’ footsteps. Bal Thakerey had divided the people on the grounds of religion to attain maximum votes from Hindus. Similarly Raj Thakeray is dividing us Indians on the basis of State to increase his vote bank. If this carries on then soon there will come a time when each state will demand to have its borders sealed and fight to become a separate country. There was a time when we Indians were proud of our diversity but now this diversity is becoming a liability to be misused by politicians.

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

BHUTAN: A PEACEFUL PARADISE (Interview)

“There is no armed conflict in Bhutan maybe that’s why people of Bhutan are happy”, said Mr Kinley Dorji, chief editor of Kuensel. Some of his anwers are as follows:

Q: According to you what should be the media’s role in armed conflict?
A: Umm… in armed conflict you should be objective and professional in reporting. But I would like to emphasize that sensivity is very very important. Media should be sensitive and objective in varying interest. If you talk about the role … the goal is not just about report but to go beyond that, to find solution of the problems. That would also mean reporting it objectively, analyzing and offering solution…suggestion.

Q: What kind of conflict do you have in your region?
A: Right now.. umm.. You’re talking about armed conflict?

Q: Yes!
A: There is no armed conflict in Bhutan.. Maybe that’s why my country people are so happy.. But yes we had one experience of armed conflict. In 2003, the indian militants of North East had come inside the Bhutanese forest. But Bhutanese army flushed them off. That’s the only conflict I had experienced.

Q: Do print and electronic media behave differently in armed conflict?
A: Electronic media is little bit difficult because you need to go with crew and equipments. So I find it little difficult. It is difficult to do today’s coverage. Radio goes around little easier but perhaps the easiest is the print. Print plays a very important role in our situation.. Anyway… because we were able to give the proper facts, figures, proper picture, analysis and bigger and broader story.

Q: What do you think is the most poweful media?
A: The most powerful media is gossip. Be it any medium, it is strong and influential. The other point of armed conflict is, reporting beyond human impact of people. We need to work hard in reporting the facts and also work hard in reflecting them.

Q: Are there any government control over media?
A: No..no government control, but what is happening in Bhutan is the whole concept of media is new. So government, society and even media is a new thing to experience… and there are no law to control for government to control either. We have monarchy. But what is happening in 2008, there will be new constitution. There will be democracy. It will guarantee freedom of expression, freedom of media and right to information.

Q: How do the people react to this new media in Bhutam?
A: Bhutan is very small country hidden up in the mountain. It is not very developed. The journalist are respected and treated as educated class.

{I had taken his interview on March 28, 2006 in The Indian Habitat Centre. Mr Kinley Dorji, one of the renowned journalist of Bhutan was also invited.}